Tag Archives: INC

Rallying Behind Rahul/ Congress To Save Democracy

The Modi regime has destroyed everything in our Democracy. It threatens the survival of our institutions/ media/ opposition parties. Its efforts to poison/ divide/ intimidate everyone to submission are almost complete. Many opposition leaders are united/ busy rejecting Rahul.

It is astonishing and bewildering to note the misuse of political power and how willingly, shamelessly, and nakedly the Godi media is dancing to the tunes of the Modi regime. Their intimidation of courts is an ongoing process. If they succeed, the end of Democracy is certain.

The Supreme Court may help to save/ retrieve our Democracy. But we cannot take that for granted. The fascist Modi regime will go to any extent for their political survival. The power now rests with the people. They cannot do it on their own. We do not have many options left.

Nitish Kumar may convince Mamta, Akhilesh, Kejriwal, Pawar, YSR, Jagan and other opposition leaders and parties. They should know that that is the only way they can redeem themselves and their parties for all the sins committed by them in the creation of this monster Modi.

It is not the time to blame the Congress. There were and are many Mamtas/ Pawars within Congress working for their power and position way beyond their means and worth. It is not just the G 23. They are the tip of the endless overambitious leaders who misused/ weakened Congress.

The only person who can mobilise people all over India is Rahul Gandhi. There is no one other than him who is visible at the moment. There is no use wasting time in searching for one. If the opposition leaders fail to stand behind Rahul, they will become irrelevant to people.

People should reroute politics into selfless service. Political power/ position has become an addiction/ intoxication for politicians to perpetuate their hold on to power by its misuse/ manipulation and to use it to accumulate wealth for themselves or their friends/ relatives.

It is not that difficult for people to identify Rahul Gandhi. His political vision, commitment, path and ability to mobilise/ execute with courage/ conviction are absolute. His mission is on march and set. He will break all barriers/ obstacles to save Democracy for our people.

Possible Way Out To Spread Truth

The scope

I mentioned that change is needed to get away from the beaten track in my last blog – ‘Identifying and propagating truth.’ The potential for it is unlimited. But we tend to detest changes. So it has to be made adaptable, comfortable, preferably using existing practices.

Social media has its limitations. It does not cater to all sections of people. Even those who use it find it difficult to discern truth and its dimensions. But we can reach most of the opinion-makers, party leaders, cadres and supporters. So, they are our first target. 

This primary target or audience is known and familiar as we are already part of it. We have friends, followers, groups and participants, active or inactive. Even if we are not connected directly, most of them are reachable. But information does not reach freely due to bottlenecks.

The problem is twofold; the absence of an exclusive platform and the failure to sit around and discuss constructively. The truth is one, but it acquires many colours, shades with varying perceptions, positions, depth, intricacies and priority. We invited this chaos.

Honest discussions can produce a commonality in approach to understand the facts and truth and develop, organise ways to create awareness among the people. The liberal voices are divided, isolated, unorganised, independent and avoid discipline or regimen even to fight evils.

But the positive factor is most of the liberals are not opposed to discussions, logic and reasoning. If a platform is ready, they will participate. Constructive debates and solutions may emerge. Can we not organise more inclusive social media chat rooms or discussion platforms?

There is also scope to develop interactive, interlinked groups. It is not new. The group chats, interactions exclusive or more inclusive are prevalent. We can use pre-existing groups and create new ones for more intensive, honest discussions, exchanges of opinion on all issues.

The method

The main thrust should be for interlinking and spreading information, thoughts, ideas and truths. It may be through our interactive group discussions or from other groups, individuals, reports, articles or blogs. People should receive what we perceive as true and right.

For spreading truth and adopting any tool or method, one need not wait for an initiative from the leadership. The cadres and supporters can do it on their own. It is not a difficult process. They can use Facebook groups, WhatsApp or any other media where the scope is available.

Many have a crowded timeline on Twitter. But it provides for grouping together users in separate lists. One may not miss valuable tweets if they use lists. These lists can be private or public; can be shared with others. One can appear in lists of many Twitter users.

It will help the process of networking and free-flowing interactions. There is scope for sharing content across social media platforms and through direct messages, group formation and conversations on Twitter. It will create a broader platform to share ideas, information.

Apart from individual efforts to facilitate such platforms, organised methods and strategies of parties, groups, experts, leaders will create the best impact. Practically, nothing is impossible to enable the routine exchange of views and opinions by the people of this country.

It is surprising that even after seven years the truth about the Modi regime has not fully percolated in all its dimensions to the people except through their sufferings and personal experiences. All regional parties are limiting themselves to live in their comfort zones.

BJP is making hay while the opposition stands divided, not united to the extent needed. Congress is trying hard to sort out differences among its leaders. It is not sparing enough efforts for using cadres to strengthen Congress, mobilise opinion and spread the truth to the people.

The problem with Congress is that secrecy is never its strength. The internal discussions for the party or public issues will not be on a closed platform. Its differences and positions will become public; it may embarrass leaders. It will be handy material for opponents and media.

Congress can still get out of the present complicated situations with confusions prevailing all over. If the top leadership decides to take the lead and a firm stand after due deliberations, it may evolve ways and means to establish platforms and percolate truth to the people.

Identifying and propagating the truth 

Identifying truth

Many of us are not clear and sure about the facts and truths behind issues and problems. It has to be so when the platform for discussions are generally non-existent, limited and faulty. It is valid for all parties, groups, institutions, organisations and also governments.

Social media is an unorganised platform with limited controls and unlimited indisciplines. It will not produce complete, comprehensive discussions to evolve conclusions. But the free flow of information and opinion will help access many facts, which get hidden from public view.

The facts and truth that flows in Social media carry with it untruths, misinformation and disinformation. The segregation of what is true becomes a challenging exercise indeed, even for learned minds to sort out and arrive at the correct conclusions.

We are now in a modern world but living amidst people and groups with primitive mindsets. We have all the tools and intelligence to use, but we invariably confuse or succumb to confusions created by street-smart politicians and the so-called educated intellectuals. 

Usually, one does not have abilities to look at all angles to present the comprehensive picture while writing views or responding to them on social media. Their viewpoints are based more on perception, opinion, information that they sourced, heard, registered in mind over time.

Let us not assume that whatever we say is true. It may be true. May always includes may not. So the discussions should be allowed to continue for all questions and answers, views and reviews. Then we may be able to evaluate, more correctly assess what is probably true and right.

We should listen and be honest in our opinion. We should not get carried away by passions and love for our leaders but strive to be objective, to help in analysis and conclusions to bring out the truth. That should be the goal, whichever may be the media we choose. 

We should be conscious that what reaches people should be an indisputable truth, preferably on all issues. That is the best way to fight Modi, BJP, RSS lies and propaganda. First, we should have clarity of mind and try to develop in-depth knowledge through constructive discussions.

There is scope for creating exclusive platforms to freely exchange views, information within selected groups who share a common agenda and outlook. The potential for such exploratory, innovative work is unlimited. But we are running on the beaten track amidst social media chaos.

Propagating truth

We live in abnormal times when destructive forces spread lies and rely on propaganda, creating confusion and dividing society, spreading hatred. We cannot expect or wait for a Gandhiji to emerge from the ashes to lead and light the way to uphold the truth.

Whether it is Gandhi or others who lead the country, it is definitely not the job of one leader in the present complicated situations created in the devil’s workshop. Even Gandhiji was not alone in his mission. Congress leaders, workers and followers supported him.

When the issues involved are concerning individuals, it is likely to be a matter of their concern and responsibility. When it is a public issue and public welfare, the burden falls on every person to bring in the truth and clarity behind problems and issues. 

Social media is one of the best free tools available if used correctly. Gandhiji travelled by foot, bullock carts and trains to spread the truth to millions. Now we have the internet and social media to do the legwork to carry messages. But we are not Gandhis to care about the truth.

We can succeed in creating awareness among people without leaving everything for the leaders to do. But we are as disorganised as social media is. We have become part of the chaos. We assume to be playing our role but only add to the confusion, not in evolving solutions.

Should we take all the pains to go through a regimen of consciously propagating the truth and carrying it to the people? Can we expect social media activists to change? If we cannot correct ourselves, how can we expect people to change their perception, know the truth and vote?

It is not that difficult as it appears. If few take the lead and become committed, others will follow. Many of us speak apparent truth but do not take it to the next level of dispassionate analysis, logical conclusions. We stop short of target due to hesitations and limitations. 

We, the liberals, democrats exercise our right to differ but fail in our duty to uphold the truth. All of us have egos, opinions and selfish interests. Our leaders, parties, groups also have them and use their right to differ. BJP and RSS exploit our differences.

Unfortunately, we love to live with our differences. The truth is one, but our perceptions about it are different. Honest discussions are needed to understand the truth. They are not so transparent; they get buried deep; rarely surface. We live on hopes without working for it.

Now it has become absolutely necessary to drum and propagate truth to all corners of the country on all issues. We cannot wait for the percolation of truth to the normal process, as it will take a very long time. Congress and Rahul can and should do it. But we should do what we can.

Rebuild Congress; Uphold Truth; Save Democracy

The core base

We can talk euphorically and ecstatically about the great wins of our leaders in a first-past-the-post electoral system. It may not be true that one scoring 31% vote is very popular while the opponent with 5% or 10% less is not so. Innumerable factors come into play, not popularity.

Modi was not a popular mass leader in 2014 and 2019 as some wish to believe it to be. The power brokers and breakers within Congress and the innumerable power centres within the opposition have divided votes. That ensured their defeat to gift victory to BJP.

BJP increased their voter base thanks to the credibility given by liberals and anti-Congress opposition. Here one has to distinguish between the cadre base with Ideological links and the floating voters fooled by the lies, promises, dramatic and event management skills of Modi.

The floating voters also included a high percentage of those voting for BJP due to the TINA factor. The opposition parties were still divided in 2019 with Congress leaders not fully backing Rahul. Further, Modi by then found an alternative with misuse of power, men and machines.

The cadre base of BJP with committed voters is still apparently lower than 15% if one takes away the new entrants from other parties pulled in using all tricks and threats. The true worth will come out once they start losing hold on to power. The signs are already visible. 

The core voters and supporters of Congress remain at 20% despite the inaction of its leaders, perpetuating organisational weaknesses and poor poll management. Congress has earned this support due to its work, credibility and trustworthiness over several decades since independence.

It is so despite several splits. Many of its leaders took away Congress cadre base. Many others backstabbed while remaining within. Congress certainly does not deserve this, as it has not done any harm to these leaders but hurt itself by promoting them within.

No Compromise

The groups that parted from Congress are hurting even more now by dividing votes, forming a party or joining others. They, along with other parties, make deals, compromises with all, including BJP. Still, Congress is to form alliances with such parties and groups to fight BJP.

Most of these opposition parties are not even democratic. Panchayat elections in UP and Bengal under SP, Mamata regimes are typical examples. Some of them are as ruthless as the BJP. Their opportunism paves the way for BJP to adopt it in UP now more brutally and savagely.

It gives rise to a tricky situation where Congress is supposed to go soft on opposition parties when they indulge in vulgar misuse of power. This arrogance and authoritarian approach is also the success formula followed by Modi. We have new entrants like KCR, Jagan in this group.

Diluting values will not save Democracy from Modi or some of these regional leaders of the opposition. Congress should register its objection with intensity and force for all such anti-democratic actions, irrespective of the parties involved. It is needed now.

If such criticism of opposition parties hurts an opposition unity or alliance, there is no need for Congress to worry about it. Upholding truth and saving democracy is more valuable for Congress and the people. It will be better for the credibility of Rahul and Congress.

Congress should not compromise principles, policies, values for the sake of power. It should devise strategies and act boldly to bring out truth before the people and save democracy. It has a solid foundation to build on and strengthen Congress at every level and state.

Rebuild Congress

Congress failed due to its mismanagement of the organisation. Being democratic and liberal does not mean that they are to suffer flagrant violations of rules and disciplines. Democracy cannot survive if rules are not observed. That is true for the country as well as for the party.

Can we think of our country or democracy succeeding without the enforcement of law and the legal system? Congress should enforce discipline. It needs dispute resolution mechanisms for the party. The personal relationship often comes in the way, hurting the party and its progress.

Some administrative lapses in governance also affect the party. The failure to expose Modi in the Gujarat riots and ensure speedy trial and delivery of justice is one of the prime factors behind the present problems. Further, Congress made a similar error in bringing UAPA. 

They should have had the foresight to visualise that the barbarian and unlawful regimes may gain roots and flourish in states and the centre. Now rulers are using UAPA to stifle dissent. It may be a failure in decision making, not deliberate, but it turned out to be grave.

These kinds of errors in judgement raise questions about the decision-making process of Congress governments and also the party. They perhaps tend to be more liberal with the delegation of powers without closer monitoring and control. Care has to be taken as experts also fail.

Flagging issues in governance are more effortless as it has a support system to identify problems and evolving solutions. But they neglect the party when they govern. When they are not in power, problems get multifold. It need not be zero tolerance but should not be zero action.

Congress even failed to utilise its strengths. Congress grew on the sacrifice of countless principled, charismatic leaders. Gandhi family still retains that trust and brand name. Their love and dedication for the people and their welfare remain underutilised by Congress leaders.

The Gandhi family only has that charisma and not others. Congress always secured more than 40% of the vote share under their leadership except in 1977. It ended with Rajiv. Modi, BJP, RSS fear that the charisma of Gandhis can pose a mammoth challenge if Congress stands behind them.

Surprisingly some leaders in Congress see Rahul as a threat to their political existence. They are selfish to the core. Congress should ignore them if they do not change. They should rely on cadres, supporters, people to spread the truth and strengthen Congress and Democracy.

Reestablishing truth and political values: Who will do?

Our land cherishes truth and values. We love people speaking the truth from their hearts. But the near-absence of such qualities in our political leaders is strange. Instead, they spread lies to project, protect their image, and hurt others. India should worry about its leaders.

The lies, propaganda about Congress, Rahul are obvious. Most people are aware of the truth; some have doubts, some could infer, discern. But, many of them do not support Congress, as its leaders do not inspire confidence in projecting and spreading the truth effectively.

The people want the truth and justice to prevail. The strength of Congress is its commitment to truth, values and principles. It has the experience and expertise to deliver them. Still, it fails to speak the truth loudly, spread and percolate it down to people in every way possible.

Some cadres and supporters of Congress may say that they are active and productive in social media. But it is not effective in correcting the perceptions of ordinary people. Further, they can not overcome the near-total spread of lies and propaganda by other media.

They are to use every avenue, platform to spread the truth; counter the lies, in addition to activities on social media. Congress leaders should lead, but also in effect, live and breathe truth. But most of them are reluctant, mumble and stumble to speak out their mind honestly.

Some of these Congress leaders may feel uncomfortable because of their past. But they are defending the Congress party, not themselves as individuals. Whatever may be the truth, Congress accepts and marches ahead. It has history and truth in its support. Why do leaders doubt it?

Courage and willpower to open out one’s heart and mind do not come when one is opportunistic and selfish in their actions. They cannot expect Congress, Rahul to defend and spread the truth and counter the lies while their leaders indulge in fighting for perks and berths.

How many Congress leaders talk honestly to the people about all issues. If they are allergic to speak about Modi, there are countless other issues. For that matter, how many of them appreciate Rahul openly. They should get habituated to talk truth without fear and inhibitions.

It should come out of belief and conviction among Congress leaders. They do not use liberal values and freedom of speech to improve thought processes; to encourage constructive discussions within Congress. Instead, they focussed on promoting themselves, not Congress.

The quality of political leaders has degenerated a lot. It got corrupted due to the deterioration of values, principles in our political system over many decades. Congress, Rahul is the only hope we have, at present, to reestablish truth and political values in our country.

Is Congress ready for a political comeback?

Most of us concede that Congress is yet to get into the act for making a political comeback. It has potential, expertise but organisationally not yet prepared. Many of us feel that Congress top leadership should be bold and make assertive moves to mobilise people in its favour.

Should we blame the top leadership of Congress for its failures? Who is responsible? Who can bring about the changes needed? Many will have only one name in their mind. It is that of Rahul. If he failed, why and how is he expected to solve it? Because there is no one else visible.

Congress has innumerable seniors with professional, political expertise but not enough to lead and control the party. Rahul is still young as he has not gained enough political and professional skills to manage his leaders. Congress chose him; he pays for its failures.

Rahul cannot do a miracle as a leader. He needs the support of the organisation, its leaders, and cadres. We cannot blame the runner with the baton to finish the line and win the race when other runners in the relay race fail miserably. Their responsibility ends with blaming Rahul.

After failures, many become invisible. Why did the senior leaders and experts not have brainstorming sessions to analyse failures? Why could they not evolve, effect necessary course corrections needed to set right the organisation? They are professionals who only act when assigned.

Rahul is not a professional but only continues as a leader, working for strengthening the party even after he resigned from the post of Congress President. If he had withdrawn his active involvement and gone invisible like other leaders, Congress would be in shambles now.

For most leaders, working for the party is only a voluntary limited service. They may undertake a task if specifically asked. But when it is a post of influence or power, they claim it as their right. When will they change their indifferent, self-centred approach?

The leaders are the backbone of the organisation to mobilise, activate cadres, involve people to discuss and evolve solutions. The charisma of top leadership cannot fill that void. If the leaders are spineless, listless, it will be hard for Congress to make a political comeback.

Political heat generated by Media and Modiphobia

The political heat, expectations created by the overkill of every news and view by all visual and social media only add to confusion among people. They tend to expect all decisions and solutions on their breakfast table, as if, there will be no lunch or dinner.

In politics, whatever you see, is not the reality; and whatever is reality, you do not see: Ashok Gehlot. Congress leaders know that hysteria, high tide and hyperboles do not last long. Congress waits for an opportune moment to launch its response. It tests the patience of all.

Their hungry, angry cadres and supporters are disappointed as they do not have anything on their plate for breakfast, lunch and dinner. They are not aware of Congress action plan for years. Is it not a communication gap? Congress could have addressed it. But patience is required.

Congress is always traditional in its approach. If they decide on a plan they may announce it for all, including cadres. They adhere to the process and expect the results to flow from it. Unless it is on the anvil, die is cast, no one knows. They may have it in mind, not on hand.

The cadres and supporters may be rightly disappointed with recent poll results. If the process is correct, then it should reflect on the outcome. However, the process on the anvil is not only election strategies but also to set right organisational weaknesses affecting them.

It is not that Congress is reserving its energy for the final assault. The process is on. It is slow but steady and healthy but will not serve you 2-minute noodles. One has to pick up threads from narratives and link them to understand what is likely to follow.

It may be disputed, but the position of Congress has not deteriorated since 2019. Rahul’s image, acceptance has strengthened. It is crucial for Congress at present. They are seriously working on inner-party disputes; Priyanka is ably assisting Rahul. The combo is working well.

Is it justified to make cadres and supporters rely on inferences, interpretations instead of concrete evidence, statements, actions, results to enthuse themselves to work vigorously for the party? The expectations are our creations. But Congress always works this way.

There is a sense of anxiety, restlessness, hunger for actions and results on the floor. It is more due to the disease ‘Modiphobia’ aggravated by the heat generated by the media. The failing charisma and falling mask of Modi in states shows RSS worries. We need not worry too much.

Overrated Chanakya and over-smart Strategist

Overrated Chanakya

Realpolitik works on realism and pragmatism. With many uncompromising characters and groups involved, the political scenario is presently too complex. It is bursting with many options, possibilities and pitfalls to stitch together a political opposition. No one is realistic, pragmatic.

One should have abilities and credibilities. If not, even Princes cannot succeed. If Pawar is a real Chanakya, why has he not made his daughter a Queen or Ajit Pawar a King? Akhilesh will not be Mulayam, Tejashwi will not be Lallu, Abhishek cannot be Mamata. That is reality.

Pawar knows the depth and realities of the problems involved. Old age does not end ambitions but blunts vision. So he talked to strategist Prashant Kishor to explore possibilities. He may help to some extent. But he will not be able to succeed in this assignment, if engaged.

Pawar has to deal with firebrand Mamata, wean away Stalin whose party has time-tested relationships with Congress; parties like SP, RJD, AAP with limited jurisdiction but unlimited ambition. They have different characteristics and local challenges to encounter. 

How are they going to trust Pawar? What great motivation will they have in toeing his line? Can they ignore Congress? All have a mind of their own. They will not yield so easily. That is why he needs a strategist who has a working, professional relationship with most of them.

Pawar would prefer traditional, political ‘power tools’ to modern operators if age is on his side. He is a man in a hurry with a much-harried path to achieve his mission. He also has to tackle Congress. But the operator he opts for is not a great magician to do the rope tricks.

Over-smart Strategist

Prashant Kishor is an over-smart strategist or operator with technical tools, statistics, theories and half-truths. He has intellectual imagination, visualisation rather than vision. These strategists may look apparently honest and not transparently so. Their claims are doubtful.

There is too much euphoria built, but their successes are to be studied in-depth. PK’s ‘Khat pe Charcha’ UP election campaign with Rahul in 2016 ended in fiasco. It was worse event management, typically an artificial approach of an intellectual far away from reality.

One cannot give too much credit for his reported or claimed successes in securing wins for YSRCP, AAP, TMC, for Congress in Punjab, Mahagathbandhan in 2015 in Bihar. They were all one-sided contests. Congress was almost nonexistent or withdrawn in Andhra, Delhi, Bengal.

The contests were BJP vs others and TDP vs YSRCP in Andhra. The spectacle of storm and fury in Bengal elections was due to the personalities involved and their fiery campaign style. The final vote percentage is very much similar to those in Delhi, Andhra.

The recent win of DMK was not due to PK. It had earlier swept the 2019 Lok Sabha polls with the same alliance of Congress and others. Further, the near-sweep of the Kongu belt by AIADMK in Tamilnadu does reflect negatively on the work of the professional strategist.

The idea of engaging a strategist now for the Lok Sabha elections of 2024 appears to be impractical. What will happen in state elections before that is far more important. The scenario may change entirely. What strategies can one plan now? They can play it live if they are alive.

What is the actual utility of these strategists and Event Managers? We do not learn even after suffering for seven years from Modi, the Great Event Manager and his creators in 2014. We are still crazy about engaging one such manager without understanding the truth and reality.

We neither need Chanakyas nor strategists. They mainly indulge in all tricks to fool people, changing their perception, clouding their vision with half-truths and lies. The best and shortest way to earn a good name and trust from people is to be good and trustworthy. Rahul has it.

Will accommodate Congress in 2nd front: NCP ❗🤣

Sharad Pawar is always a man with a mission. Whether it is sunshine or pouring rain, his campaign for power and position never ends. But why, after being Chanakya for decades, does he need a strategist? Congress is obstructing his path. He has to tame this elephant to ride on it.

He may be a Chanakya who always remains alert for political opportunities or for exploiting the weaknesses of others. Even Modi acknowledged him as a guru, maybe with a purpose. But all Chanakyas are not of the same calibre. Some are cutthroat professionals, and some are not. 

Pawar is of subtle variety, gentle, soft but conceals that clever and cunning tactical mode to achieve his mission and ambition. He does a balancing act on a tightrope overtly. But his actions are discreet, secretive beyond one’s vision. He keeps his options always open.

Pawar reactivated a Munch to web together 3rd or 4th front. Some leaders and individuals participated in formal or informal discussions. They selectively included some Congress leaders who declined to attend. The obvious undeclared purpose was to explore options without Congress.

Some members eventually broke the truth and spoiled the party, saying there can be no joint Opposition front without Congress. Soon the meeting was declared non-political, attended by individuals. The joke finally came out. They will accommodate Congress in a 2nd front.

One tends to ignore the truth that Congress existed despite the organisational weaknesses for decades. It is so after many divisions, departures of leaders, cadres. It still has widespread support from the masses. It has earned their trust for its principles, policies.

Maybe the non-Congress opposition also wants Congress-Mukt Bharat. It is not going to happen. If BJP goes through its plans and brings about constitutional changes, manoeuvre and manipulate the majority, India may become a ‘regional party Mukt Bharat’.

They negotiate alliances on perceptions. It involves the transferability of votes, how comfortably leaders and cadres work together, how they sabotage prospects of alliance partners to increase their strength and many more. How to make a realistic assessment of strength?

The opposition alliance is viable if there are frank discussions about strengths, weaknesses. It will be practical if it happens between parties concerned in individual states. Collective bargaining by forming a union of the 3rd or 4th front is not going to threaten Congress.

Speaking truth and facilitating it to prevail

Sometimes one is amazed at the patience, perseverance of Rahul and Gandhi family. Many of the Congress leaders are not frank, honest and open in expressing their views and opinions. It hurts decisions and makes the path difficult for them. It is torturing those noble souls.

A leader is to represent all. They are to work for the evolution of solutions to establish what is true and right. They are not lawyers to present one side or group. They are to look into truth from all sides and angles and not those convenient to them.

It has to start with transparency in interaction and discussions without hesitations, reservations, fears and threats. It is speaking the truth and facilitating it to prevail. Rahul is supposed to do what is right and just while Congress leaders are not helping but obstructing it.

If you are honest, even if you disagree, it allows the growth of mutual trust and confidence. Concealing or suppressing information or arguing about it does not help the process. If one wants to convey honest views to others, including Rahul, there are many ways.

Politicians are rarely frank and open in their opinion in public interactions with the media around them. It is understandable if they want to avoid political inconveniences. But are they honest in personal, official discussions? What is the purpose of having them?

By not speaking the truth and being honest in their views, they damage the political process and its correct execution. It is valid for all politicians. But Congress leaders have a duty and scope to change the system. It affects Congress, its leadership and also the public.

Some speak catchy one-liners. Some boisterously and loudly indulge in empty rhetorics. Some silently deceptively send messages across between the lines. It is more for creating the perception that they are in the race. None of them can stand before openness, honesty and truth.

Top leadership ultimately has to steer through the political path with necessary corrections. But why are Congress leaders making the path so hard if they really want to achieve the goal? They are not helping the process by becoming a part of the problem, not solutions.

Honest discussions, interactions about every issue confronting the party, people and the country; the application of mind, speaking out and listening to others’ views, openly or privately, is a duty. If leaders fail in it, they are not true representatives of the party or people.