Few may think that everything is going right. But there is something alarming about the absence of conversation and the proliferation of information. These weaknesses create wide variations in perception, opinion, and decisions. 

We have vast potential that remains highly underutilised. We have the necessary expertise to undertake the systemic analysis. If corrections in approach are possible, we can evolve an appropriate methodology and apply it. It will bring clarity and improve the quality of decisions. For that, the conversations should be open and free-flowing.

We may cite a typical example of wide variations in thought processes and perceptions. The Supreme Court recently stayed an Allahabad High Court order that sought to ascertain if the rape victim was Mangalik. A High Court is seeking astrological help to solve a relationship dispute.

This is the extent to which we expand our thoughts and horizons. It may be said that it is an exceptional case. What kind of exception it is and from where it comes are to be noted. Let us imagine the state of affairs at lower levels, with so many dilutions and views that exist.

This happens mainly because of the following reasons:

• Absence of focused criticism and analysis
• No effective attempt for systemic corrections to stop such errors
• Believing that it is not possible to make corrections
• When unchecked, the continuing proliferation of such views and thoughts

This indicates the enormity of the problems. We try to avoid solving them, fearing the magnitude of the task. We doubt the viability of a solution, as no one in the past or present has attempted it. We leave it for others to do when the scope and conducive atmosphere for such actions open up.

Have we lost our abilities not only to use our power but also to think, apply ideas, or mobilise talents wherever they are available to search for and find solutions? Is it really risky to search for solutions? Do we really know what the cost of analysis or application of mind is?

Why should we succumb to the fear of failure when there is absolutely no risk at all? Why should we dream about the Holocaust and the tsunami when there are several steps before implementation? Can we not assess the viability of a process or conduct a trial to test it?

The problem is that no conversation or discussion that takes place in public space goes in-depth to the root of the problems. They are left to the experts, bureaucrats, executives, researchers, and so on. Perhaps the time and abilities of these specialists are limited, so they do not waste or spend these resources.